Wanna know what's up on Planet First City (and the life and times of Floatin', Go(ld)phish, Mighty Mouse, Punky PJs, Hope-A-Holic, Agent Alphabet, Trifeck, Dharma Bum, and No Moss)? Sign up right here!

Email address:   Delivered by FeedBurner

What's up, Delhi?

The director's cut. Of a day job that makes us read too much, sing too little, drive too much, dance sometimes. Times when the mind keeps rolling while the dicta's stopped. Meet people that make us cry (also laugh), And always, always lets us go and get ourselves a drink. First City Editorial, edding @30 days a month.

Wednesday, December 02, 2009

Hit the road, Jack!


In 1957, there was a book about young boys hitchhiking their way across America. Before the Vietnam war stole America’s youth, before the hippies sang make love not war, before things got dreary and sad and politics coloured the whole nation a dark shade of grey. Before all that, were these boys, whose business was to experience life, youth and their motherland and to run amok across it’s plains. Thanks to Jack Kerouac, who recorded their story, we’ll always know them as the Beat Generation, the one that celebrated beatitude. Thanks to Kerouac’s On the Road, I know who Dean Moriarty was, who Sal Paradise was, and how to get from New York to San Francisco in the back of a truck.

And if I could ever meet him (may be in Beat heaven), I’d thank Kerouac immensely for Sal. For Sal Paradise made my life.

I left with my canvas bag in which a few fundamental things were packed and took off for the Pacific Ocean with the fifty dollars in my pocket.

When I met Sal and his friends for the first time, it was a cold December in Delhi. It’s funny I read of their journeys on the road sitting on the road myself, the road outside my college. Waiting for my daily ride back home, I’d sit under a tree surrounded by so many young boys and girls, reading about another set that lived across the globe, half a century ago. It’s hard to say if it was the setting, or just being in college, or the sheer beauty of Kerouac’s words that made me connect so deeply with the novel. But nonetheless, I did. If you asked someone who their best loved character in On the Road was, they’d probably say Dean Moriarty (especially if you’re asking Jim Morrison), after all he was so damn eccentric. What with three wives, god knows how many children, no money and that insane nonchalance about everything! He was an amazingly interesting character, but that’s what he was - a character. And so if you ask me, it has to be Sal. He was so real that he made a great entry point into the text and gave it so much personal context. To say I understood him would be close, but to say I understood myself through him, would be spot on. A simple man, ordinary really, and always accepting his ordinariness against the iridescence of others around him. And yet, in spite of all his humility, he wasn’t ordinary at all, but highly relatable.

At a time when I felt that I was wasting my life not doing anything great or adventurous, not doing enough exciting things (you’re only 21 once!), Sal came to me like a torch bearer. As a writer in New York, he longed to break free and hit the road, just to go meet his friends and spend a long summer together. That’s what the road started out as, for him, a means of getting to Dean and Co.. Earning each penny along the way, he made many journeys, first to reach his friends and then, to reach himself. He met so many people, learnt new things, got so completely baked in Mexico, got sick afterwards, listened to Jazz and danced to it all night, drove across the mainland in an expensive car he ended up destroying pretty badly later, and even fell in love and decided to never return to New York again. He did all that, never once claiming he did something grand, but always insisting he made simple journeys. And he made me see how simple it was to do something with your life, even if it meant taking a short trip to a place close by or a longer road back home, you could find adventures anywhere. But most importantly, even at home, on your typewriter, where Sal ended up recording the entire story that constitutes the novel …And nobody, nobody knows what’s going to happen to anybody besides the forlorn rags of growing old…

It’s a cold December again, and I think, yes, Sal Paradise did make my life. Everything in my life that followed my reading of this book, was an attempt to channel his spirit. Always choosing the road over the destination, and always doing it for myself. So thank you Kerouac, for a meeting with Sal and a glimpse of paradise.


Love,

*~Dharma Bum~*

Monday, November 09, 2009

TAKING WOODSTOCK

Same week, watched it twice. First time I needed to imbibe the hippie spirit and the second time I went for Michael (Jonathan Groff). Probably one of the most beautiful hippies to grace the silver screen. And after watching the film, you wanna walk on the streets, going peace this and love that! What do these hippie films really do for you? What is it about these funnily-clad men and women, with unwashed dreadlocks and a big grin on their faces that makes us melt and slow down? And while most of us say, ‘We were born in the wrong decade’, some of the others say, ‘I was there man’. To me the hippies had (have!) a lens, an alternative view of the world; a world that needed (needs!) a lot of healing and love. The hippie era is also about the time when one brother was fighting the war in Vietnam and the other was swaying to the sound of Bob Dylan’s Blowing in the Wind and John Lennon’s Imagine.
Taking Woodstock is about Elliot, a young boy who thought he could have Woodstock (the festival) in his backyard and invite 10,000-something people, who’d attend the festival and bunk at his godforsaken, run-down inn, without realising the extent of how far he could go with that innocent thought. And before we know it, a wild bunch of hippies show up at Elliot’s doorstep and set up camp for the greatest music festival of peace and love. Everyone who was anyone thumbed their way to the venue and realised their potential in this world of anarchy and violence. They did their bit by sending out their light and powerful energies to the world (at least that’s how I’d like to romanticise and picture it). Speaking of which, weren’t the hippies the biggest crack in the system (George Orwell way), who didn’t question the society but drifted to their own way of living - a connection with the earth (flower power) and free love. Of course, no one can deny the existence of substance abuse in their lives but I’d like to put in the argument of human beings being extremists here. We usually do end up going to one or the other end of the spectrum, before planting our feet in the middle ground.
Taking Woodstock is essentially just another reminder that’ll help you take a step back and look around you. May be even pose introspective questions about where you are in life; if you belong with your current circle of influence and most importantly, if you have love and joy in your life. Love and joy, simple yet profound words, but do we really feel peace and love in our everyday existence? Are we truly celebrating our normal drifting or waiting for an outside influence that’ll give us a reason to celebrate? A yes and a no to that because there are days which feel sorted and moments which don’t. Agent Alphabet’s quote would probably explain the yes and the no better - Consistent behaviour or consistency is the hobgoblin of little minds. Who needs it? I mean who needs it after watching the film.

Peace and love!
hope-a-holic

Saturday, November 07, 2009

Fresh off the Oven: The FC Newbies

The young 'uns are dead. Long live the young 'uns.

So, in order of joining the team, here they are - First City's all-new, hot-blooded Eddies.
Able and willing.
Ready to blog-rock.

Hope-a-holic
Tree-loving (banyan tree printed on the skin), bird-watching (minus the crazy pigeons that bang themselves against the glass door every morning), with a Calvinesque energy and love for gooey chocolate cake and cheese, all rolled into one!

Dharma Bum
When the hills come a calling, I set my feet in motion and let my heart lead the way. Sadly, sometimes I hear the call, but must let it ring till it fades out. What to do, life is such. It’s always measured in priorities and I seem to be getting them wrong a lot. An ipod with some good ol’ rock ‘n’ roll, orange pyjamas, a good book and a whole lotta conversation - that’s me, Dharma Bum (a big, huge salute to Jack Kerouac) - bumming my way through life, and loving each moment. As a side note, hippies were awesome and ‘Glory Glory Man. Utd.!’ Watch this space; I’m off for a smoke.

Agent Alphabet
The wise man who emerged as a great thinker, poet and philosopher in mid-19th century America once said, 'A foolish consistency is the hobgoblin of little minds' and I said 'Amen!'. So random thoughts and actions, as and when.

Trifeck
Hi there. My name is Trifeck, and I’ll be your occasional host for the next year or so.
You’re probably wondering what this post is doing up here. First City blog, so First City info, one would imagine? Well, kind of. Y’see, I started work with FC about a month and a half ago, and since I didn’t commit suicide after the first proofing session, they figured I was ready for the blog. Floatin’ told me to pick a name, write an intro and post the damned thing already, so here I am, posting the damned thing already. Don’t let it be said that I don’t follow orders.
I’m 25, male, a writer, a reader, a smoker, a thinker, and I have a dog.
Yup, seems to cover it. G’night, people.

So, first up, hope-a-holic. Watch this space.

Monday, October 05, 2009

October


Fashion Special: Tarun Khiwal - Images + Interview
Prabuddha Dasgupta, Gurcharan Das, Sarah Hall, Mixed Tape, and High Five in FCBOOKS.
Bharat Sikka talks Salvador de Mundo. Plus, Daily Listings, Previews, Festivals, for October. In FC2.
Live is where the love is in Night Action, while Band Aid plays Circus.
Plus What's New and Restaurant Reviews in Food & Nightlife.
And when in doubt, zorb, FCInside recommends.

Wednesday, September 09, 2009

what we're listening to: horehound



HOREHOUND
The Dead Weather
In the tradition of Black Sabbath and Marilyn Manson, comes powerful evil in the guise of Mr Jack White and his entourage (a new avatar of The White Stripes now that sister Meg White seems busy with whatever it takes to be Patti Smith’s daughter-in-law). Almost funny how the devil-possessed rock n’ roll tag still sticks (even if actual pigeon-eating has been replaced by tattoos of Osbourne eating pigeons), but what was serious sound business then, holds true even now - if it’s good music, it’s good music. So, it’s hard and dark, vampirish, Horehound, in the most delicious and seductive of ways.
Teaming up with Alison Mosshart of The Kills (an inde American rock band best known for the track Keep on Your Mean Side), she of the mesmering Goth vocals, Jack walks familiar terrain and breaks new ground with song-writing.
60 Feet Tall, album opener, is almost a tease, dangerously building drumsticks rubbing off each other that soon present, exhibit, showcase Alison’s voice (‘You’re so cruel and shameless but I cant leave you be’), even as Doors-like organ blasts and angry guitar slashes keep time with her. She’s unstoppable and track after track, unleashes terror, masterfully unfolding her devious scheme to trap ‘a nice Catholic boy’: ‘I’d like to grab you by the hair and hang you up from the heavens… sell you off to the devil’ on Hang You up from the Heavens, she threatens, and ‘I love you like a woman but cut like a buffalo’ is her matter of fact opinion on yup, I Cut Like A Buffalo. Jack blends in on vocals (besides playing fabulously dirty guitars) on So Far From Your Weapon, as the snarling continues through awesome compositions that include Treat Me Like Your Mother, New Pony, No Hassle Night, even a mad instrumental one titled Birds (creepy even if you think those feathered beings are sweet). There’s a rattling climax that doesn’t let you be, even for those of us so far far away from those religious complexities of guilt, tainted love, burning crosses, and dope stars.
This one’s a killer. A keeper.

Tuesday, July 21, 2009

MICHAEL JACKSON (1958-2009)


Mid-eighties. Thriller came out. Causing a 2009 epiphany - He was MAGIC before we grew up and thought that word lame.
Early nineties. Black or White ‘premiered’ on MTV. And deja vu - Man, he is MAGIC.

Not much changes if you’re a Michael Jackson fan.

Because then you don’t care about any of the other stuff - pet chimpanzees and oxygen chambers and skin grafting and cheek implants and Peter Pan dreams and sexuality musings and ______ (add anything else ridiculous you must’ve heard). It’s only about what you’ve seen this man do, song after song, video after video, stage show after stage show.
When you moonwalk (attempt to, i.e.) in earnestness, with the number of years you’ve spent on the planet all encompassed within one single digit, you don’t do cynicism. You just watch, hear, respond, emulate. Reflex action. What you don’t do is analyse, discuss, hem and haw, reject, judge. Versions of which, ugly most, all appear in the papers, on the channels, day in and day out. Ever since June 25 this year. When our part of the world woke upto that piece of information - Michael Jackson is dead. And a thought bubble exploded - But he’s too much to be dead, really. Simultaneously accompanied and supported by visions from the past, some recent too, of a man holding an entire planet spellbound, captive, everyone equally mesmerised by the power of performance, so pure. Frantic calls were made, desperate e-mails sent, across the world, perhaps to lessen that feeling of devastation, of being crushed, share the sadness with others who were feeling the loss… But it didn’t help, did it? It still felt like your entire childhood flashing before your eyes, didn’t it?

He influenced Madonna as much as Prabhudeva, the world of advertising as much as live performance. And we finally lose him to, what, Propofol? Technically, perhaps, though it goes much deeper, and we all know it, don't we?

There was a time MJ would defend himself; as in the book, Moonwalk: I'd like to set the record straight right now. I have never had my cheeks altered or my eyes altered. I have not had my lips thinned, nor have I had dermabrasion or a skin peel. All of these charges are ridiculous. If they were true, I would say so, but they aren't. I have had my nose altered twice and I recently added a cleft to my chin, but that is it. Period. I don't care what anyone else says its my face and I know. And there was a time when he simply stopped, investing energies elsewhere instead. Building that Neverland ranch, and buying Beatles songs copyrights, yes. But more memorably, standing atop the Statue of Liberty and addressing the world: ‘Damn if you agree with me, when I saw you kicking dirt in my eyes… I don’t wanna spend my life being a colour’. Infusing anger and attitude and bravado into the powerful They Don’t Really Care about Us (watch that prison version again, by the way), and the brilliant Janet Jackson collaboration Scream. Giving us Dangerous (1991) and HIStory (1995). But who was listening when he echoed ‘Stop pressuring me’, or even earlier, when he was still struggling with that most tragic of dilemmas, hollering out Leave me Alone (‘Don’t stop loving me. Just leave me alone’)? Not the press, not the critics, not even the fans. ‘He wants to be the King of Pop and he wants to be left alone’, complained one journalist in the 90s, mirroring what we all wanted on different levels - a piece of Michael Jackson.

It might be uncomfortable to deal with, but we’re all in this together, I’m afraid.

Also, when you bring out Thriller, to date the best selling pop album of all time, and win eight Grammies, while you’re still 24, it’s an achievement pretty tough to beat. Even for MJ. Every album he did after that was relentlessly compared to the magnificence of Thriller, and was invariably labelled ‘not good enough’. An album that kick-starts with Jam, sexes it up with In the Closet, experiments like hell with Give in to Me (man, that supernova Slash solo!), pulls off the ultimate pop spectacle with Remember the Time, and is still not done (Who Is It, Heal the World, Will You Be There, and of course, Black Or White all lined up with those kings of B-side tracks, Why You Wanna Trip On Me, She Drives Me Wild, Can’t Let Her Get Away), cannot ever be used in the same sentence as ‘not good enough’, and that’s plain common sense. But MJ, constantly reacted to the critics, and found himself competing with well, himself. Minus Quincy Jones. And then we wonder if he maybe lost it?!

But it was a different story when he made an appearance shortly after the London 02 arena concerts were finalised and announcements were made. Funnily, it was only when we saw him then, in a wheelchair, waving to fans, looking as morbid as ever, that we realised we hadn’t seen much of him in the last, what, decade? He hadn’t surfaced for so long that we’d all become resigned to accepting (inventing the conspiracy theory?) that this is the artist formerly known as Michael Jackson, that he’s a shadow of his former self and has been so since You Rock My World, that, somehow, the MJ of our collective childhoods, our recent pasts, our lifetimes even, has ceased to exist. That he’s moonwalked into outer space. A fact of sorts we mutely accepted, some of us sadly, and some, mockingly.
And now it’s come true, hasn’t it? Michael Jackson has disappeared. Gone incognito forever. So, beat it… Is what you want to say to the This Is It! Organisers, the Jackson family, Debbie Rowe, the sick mind that decided to make the funeral a circus (a few lucky ones could attend it for free! Wow!), the tabloids, the television shows, the anchors (Larry King, especially), and yes, to YOURSELF.

When you watched him perform, you could see (and feel) the trance. One that he created, which engulfed him, and set us all free. He was the music, the music was him. One. Those of us who feel the pain and the guilt (who are we to claim a person, a human being for our childhood?) should remember to remember him as Michael Jackson the Record Maker and Breaker, the Dancer, the Singer, the Video Auteur, the Performer. And that should be enough to sail us through.

Even if all it did was leave a big hole in his life while Michael Jackson was alive.

floatin' (who had perfected the moonwalk, or so she thought, aged 7!)

Labels: , ,

Monday, June 29, 2009

Favourite is a Strong Word

The great FC Ed series of blogposts on favourite authors has got me wondering. And quietly smiling. About how choosing favourite authors is always a confession; only ostensibly about the qualities of another person. Choosing a favourite author is always about choosing to see a part of yourself, to define yourself. Which is why (and my confession starts now), the sweet holiday-homework essay tone of My Favourite Author has evaded me all my life.
I've been tortured most of my adult life by this two-word 'favourite author?' question, sprang at me in polite conversation at parties, slambooks, author interviews - it sends out a flurry of question marks in my head, culminating in a pre-death-flash of scenes from novels I have loved. Truth be told, there is no single author I am faithful to (gasp), and in fact, there might not even be a single author whose entire ouevre I have read (me fake lit student). There isn't a doubt that I'm absolutely deliriously hungry for the gravitational pull of Amitav Ghosh's novels, that suck me eyes-wide, face-down into places and minds and eras at one go. But haven't I also lately been squealing out loud with excitement as I devour the maddeningly absorbing, superbly clever, articulate-to-the-point-of-heartbreaking ride that Vikram Chandra has set up in Sacred Games? Random scenes from Uzma Aslam Khan's novels flash so often in my brain as I go about the most mundane events of my life, that I can finally say I pretty much live with them now. I can't eat makhana without thinking about Tabish Khair's The Bus Stopped; I can't look at a raincloud without thinking of Andal's Natchiar Tirumozhi; I can't think about khadi without thinking about Nilita Vachani's Homespun; and I can't think of riverside havelis without thinking of Anuradha Roy's An Atlas of Impossible Longing. But are any of these people that Chosen One for me?

Erm. Not really.

I thought hard about this haunted question, and I did realise that although I'm a literary committment-phobe, there is one thing that makes me gush and blabber about the genius of authors like I just did - it's the way they choose to make sense of the world. Nowhere have I been more acutely aware of the presence of history, than in fiction, ironic as that may be. I don't mean it in the way of that awfully named genre of the Historical Novel aka You Can Believe it Coz it's True. I mean it in the way history is lived, understood, manipulated, authored - when an individual mind makes story-sense of the world. And very few people can convey that story to another - not by shoving it down people's throats, but rather, quite magically by evoking unarticulated experiences. And those are my favourite authors.

It is not just a convincing version of the world, but a story through which they reveal themselves. I don't love authors for revealing secrets of the universe to me in epiphanic wisdom, carefully encrypted in dazzlingly-constructed sentences. I love it rather, when their writing, whether show-offy clever or honestly simple, makes me revel in the magic of a book - that a sheaf of paper can reveal to me, in any place (a 3-hour queue, a cramped train compartment with wailing babies, a perfectly tucked in bed), an entire person in flesh and blood, through the visions it has chosen to create. When Amitav Ghosh dwells on the Irrawady dolphin's seasonal movements for pages in The Hungry Tide, I love the digression from the plot, cuz I know this is where he's letting me in on the almost-Brechtian moment where I rear my head from the story and take a look at him. It's where he's letting me write a little story of him - as I imagine him sitting in his writing room and reading a zoological tome on dolphins of the Indian subcontinent, thinking, 'I must write this into a novel some day. But how?' I love these meta-fiction moments in fiction, and I love authors who let themselves be revealed in this way. With honesty, and perhaps a twinkle-eyed smile. Without making a literary edifice of it, like Siddharth Dhanavant Shanghvi’s display-window tableaux of ‘see-what-I'm-trying?’ in his novels.

And so, the ‘favourite author’ question remains a perennial one for me, because maybe books are about fictional people who can let us conjure more fiction about real people; and as any author will tell ya, it’s hard to choose a favourite from among your own creations, right? So ‘my favourite author’ will be a happy torment I can live with (‘and purge my guilt periodically in the blog universe, hehe). Or y’knowhat, I’ll just surrender my twisted argument, take a bow and wriggle out of this tough decision, with the literary commitment-phobe’s classic metaphor-situation of convenience: All those lovely writers out there who still can’t make it to my Chosen One seat, all I gotta say is: I love you baby, but you’re not The One. It’s not you, it’s me.

punky pjs

Thursday, June 18, 2009

WANTED

professionals/graduates

for our

MARKETING TEAM

If you think you can ideate, create, work towards and market FIRST CITY and Parenting, and are interested in the branding of the magazines,
we’re looking for you.

Young, passionate, committed, with a love for the city, even better. E-mail us your detailed resume at: firstcityeditorial@gmail.com

Or send it to us at:
First City and Parenting, A 7, Sarvodaya Enclave, New Delhi-110017.

Tuesday, June 09, 2009

Words: They Transmogrify

Because I couldn’t, not in this lifetime, dare contemplate Joseph Conrad’s genius, I’m not blessed yet. Because the memory of reading Heart of Darkness is more vivid than most of my adolescence, and because, if Coppola could ruin it so, I’ll eat humble pie.

Because The Chosen One is a pastiche of thoughts, much like that wall…was it a door? the Glass brothers wrote on (oh, a ‘beaverboard’, I just checked “decorated with four somewhat gorgeous-looking columns of quotations from a variety of the world’s literatures”), where epiphanies ring to and fro, because we’re so verbal and needlessly eloquent, such wordy people need those that can tell you what lies between

"And" was the next word I lost, probably because it was so close to her name, what a simple word to say, what a profound word to lose, I had to say "ampersand", which sounded ridiculous, but there it is, "I'd like a coffee ampersand something sweet," nobody would choose to be like that. "Want" was a word I lost early on, which is not to say I stopped wanting things – I wanted things more – I just stopped being able to express the want, so instead I said "desire", "I desire two rolls" I would tell the baker, but that wasn't quite right, the meaning of my thoughts started to float away from me, like leaves that fall from a tree into a river, I was the tree, the world was the river. I lost "come" one afternoon with the dogs in the park, I lost "fine" as the barber turned me toward the mirror, I lost "shame" – the verb and the noun in the same moment; it was a shame - Extremely Loud and Incredibly Close, Jonathan Safran-Foer

Everything I hope to know and remember is on that beaverboard; a beacon of light in my head’s dark, seamy, ringing hallways. Alain De Botton for love, Toni Morrison for hate, Nick Hornby for the music, JD Salinger for my childhood’s lost cause, Antoine de Saint-Exupéry' as my lucky charm, Stephen King to replace the actual silly task of living, Pico Iyer to breathe life back into the world and Milan Kundera to remind me that nothing will ever be the same again.

So that, once more, at the end of it all, I only find comfort, respite, my final resting place, with



Go(ld): “Did you know that “Philip Sandifer, who uses Calvin and Hobbes as the main example for a reading of comic strips based on the psychoanalytic theories of Jaques Lacan, draws parallel between Hobbes's status as an imaginary friend and the Lacanian concept of the Imaginary, suggesting that a given comic strip is an attempt to construct a momentary and ephemeral present that will be dismantled by the punchline (which he allies with the Lacanian Real), wiping the slate and allowing the process to begin again the next day?”
Phish: "I'll say. Hey! What time is it?? My TV show is on

go(ld)phish

Sunday, June 07, 2009

Damn the chosen ONE: thoughts on the CHOSEN one

Being solemnly faithful to The Chosen One is, unarguably, a near-impossible task. I’m still reeling from how the writers in our First City’s June Special obliged us so. A favourite writer changes so often. You read a book, you’re swept away, and you hunger for the writer’s next one; in the meanwhile, another book beckons, you read it, and it captures you so subtly, you only know it days after you turned the last page. And even as you wallow in the bittersweet moments of having finished a book that’ll never be the same again (because now you can only re-read it, and you almost want to lock this time in that part of your brain that never ever forgets), there’s a dazzling new, stylish writer who could be new to the world, or just to you.
A favourite writer is someone who makes you giggle at first, perhaps, someone who shocks you later on, someone who reveals secret truths about experiences you haven’t had yet, someone who makes the ludicrous absolutely profound, and vice versa, someone who holds up a mirror to you, even, someone’s who’s simply hilarious, and someone who unleashes a sense of adventure and mystery. And all this could be accomplished by a single writer. Or a series of them.

There are a few first times you never ever forget, of course.

I’ll never forget reading, for instance, about Gregor Samsa’s overnight metamorphosis for the first time. It was a particularly hungover morning (not the best way to read it at all, because then the cockroach is forever fused in the mind with the sick feeling in your bloodstream), and being so struck, fascinated, discovering the word that could end and stop all conversations I figured, pretentious or otherwise - Kafka.
Or the first time I read about Salim’s pencil and a nation’s tryst with destiny, how the fantastical can even read like a book, awed by an author’s writing that is so markedly full of style. And again, the name conjures up everything good, bad and ugly about magic realism even today - Rushdie.
Or the first time The Famous Five entered my life and took over it completely. I’d seek out mysteries where there weren’t any (where was Maa’s purse last seen? Hmm?), and wished for a Timothy (what a brilliant dog!) to my George (never Anne, ‘cuz she was such a girl! Please, so not cool!), who would sniff-and-woof out the secret passageway to a mystery I could then crack. The famous five also introduced me to that feeling that only words in the hands of smart authors can evoke - of not knowing exactly what’s being talked about, but finding it very exciting nevertheless (Them eating bacon and ham for breakfast, is something I vividly remember as very tempting, until I discovered what it was and my vegetarian sensibilities reacted!). Ah, Enid Blyton!
Or reading Needful Things on never-ending bus rides, and discovering what compulsive writing is (when you can’t tear your eyes away from it and risk missing your bus at the stop hence!). And then going onto discover other greater works from the author who gives horror new meaning - Stephen King. Just the name’s enough to recreate unpleasant, spine-chilling moments.
Or spending days enamoured and seduced by Milan Kundera and the brilliant ways in which he converted all of life into an argument, intellectualising even sex. Since then, writers have tried and failed miserably trying to imitate him.
Reading Anthony Doerr’s memoirs on a Roman holiday, and falling in love with his love of nature and French nights, a reader’s vicarious living of Anthony’s parenting experiences too. Or reading Uzma Aslam Khan’s Geometry of God, a masterpiece, after being overwhelmed by her Tresspassing, and awaiting her next with something akin to a secret trepidation.

But I digress! This is about The Chosen One. It’s going to have rephrase as two’s company, in my case, though.

Douglas Noel Adams
So, here’s a writer (a favourite writer), who had a legendary reputation for not writing. His publisher had to move in with him, holding him imprisoned almost in a hotel room, so he wouldn’t miss the printers’ deadline again (And to him, we owe the priceless quote ‘I love deadlines. I like the whooshing sound they make as they fly by’). He’d always insisted that 42 ‘has no significance in relation to any other previous uses of the number 42’. He was also known for his huge collection of electric guitars and how he once performed at Earl’s Court with his mates, Pink Floyd. Man, was he cool! (And it’s still weird to use the past tense for a writer whose writing’s so alive, how he used technology in such writer-ly ways!)
His radio series started the year I was born. A year later, the book version appeared ‘based on the radio show’, still a good 16 years before I would lay my hands on it -The Hitchhiker’s Guide to the Galaxy - and find ultimate religious conversion. Here was humour, wit, meaning, ridicule, making a whole lotta sense, a pattern he followed in all of his books, through Dirk Gently’s Holistic Detective Agency and The Meaning of Liff and The Long, Dark Teatime of the Soul. Who can forget The Electric Monk (a labour saving device that believed things for you, thus saving you what was becoming an increasingly onerous task, that of believing all the things the world expected you to believe), or the cow offering its different parts to a horrified set of diners at the restaurant at the end of the universe (and that’s ‘end’, in all its meanings)?
Douglas Adams was also a writer for whom existing words were never enough. How do you explain that feeling of ///, except by inventing that word, ///? And so he did, he changed the way people spoke, and gave us shortcuts - We all need a Babel Fish in the ear, some days, when the Boss speaks in one of his inscrutable meetings. We never forget to carry towels on trips, or at least, we joke about it. We all frown at the brew in cup, on some days, that’s almost but not quite unlike tea. (Club that with Babel Fish boss day, and that makes it a Monday). And after helping us understand life, the universe and everything (or just the bizarre randomness of anything and everything disconnected), he had an asteroid named after him. (Other writers on this list include Antoine St Exupery, Nabokov, Dickens, Tolkien, Milan Kundera, CS Lewis, Dostoevsky, Kurt Vonnegut, George Orwell). But Douglas Adam’s the only one, I think, who’s had the honour of having one named after one of his characters. Yup, Arthur Dent.
“I wanted to be John Cleese”, he once said, “It took me some time to realise that the job was taken.” No one can now even attempt replacing Douglas Adams. (Oh, go away, Eoin Colfer!).

Amitav Ghosh
I’m always at a place in life where I can say, ‘Well, the last time I read Shadowlines…’ Because it’s always different from that first time I read Shadowlines, when it was always about Ila and only Ila. The resonance of the journey, the ‘going away’ and the ‘coming home’, still mark impressions on the mind.
Amitav Ghosh writes books that are Melville and Conrad washed, but with such a distinct style. You can always tell it’s Amitav Ghosh, even in his travel writing, even in The Imam and the Indian, even in his essays on the Andaman and Nicobar islands. It’s difficult to describe it, but it’s careful and deliberate, each word and expression weighed such that never is a page, a letter superfluous. He’s like the curious chronicler of our times, nonchalantly charting his own path through his novels and putting it out into the universe. Creating wonderful characters, people, who end up, in Sea of Poppies, as jahaj bhai and behen, on one ship together, almost impossibly, but also inevitably. (“Because people are inexhaustible”, he’d said in a First City interview). A breaking wave in The Hungry Tide, the Sunderbans rituals, are as alive as Piyali and Kanai and Fokir and the unlikely bond that forms between them in the pages of the novel. His books echo with a sense of the place (In an Antique Land, most memorably), all the while dealing with human emotion and the drama of life.
If you think about it (and blogposts clearly urge you to!), he’s an anthropologist, a gifted, meticulous, extremely hardworking observer, really, but the best, the most superior, kinds. And this is Amitav Ghosh’s biggest achievement. (Bigger than even his tryst with language, which transforms and throbs with its own sonority in each of his novels, most brilliantly in Sea of Poppies). He’s the only writer I know who can ease all that research and knowledge into wonderful, beautiful, compelling fiction - ease being the operative word. Because he makes it so effortless, you’ll think he was born speaking Laskari. That mammoth, gargantuan, academia that has gone into it never ever weighs his work down; it only sets it free. (A great sense of humour helps of course, something Amitav Ghosh has only perfected, in the journey from Shadowlines to Sea of Poppies).
Curiously, the only Amitav Ghosh I still haven’t read is his first one. And when I met the author during his recent book tour (the brilliant opportunity that First City is; thankyou, No Moss, for keeping this curious publication afloat for so long!), I bought a copy of The Circle of Reason, so he could sign it. Which he did, of course, very (what’s-that-word) graciously. (Though he already had me at hello and crackle chocolate). But now each time I open to finally start it, I read and re-read Amitav Ghosh’s inscription, and put it back on the bookshelf. And I secretly know it’s because I want an unread Amitav Ghosh always lying around somewhere, in my reach. Life wouldn't be the same, else.

floatin'

   Visit blogadda.com to discover Indian blogs   blog search directory  desi Blogs   Bloggapedia - Find It!